Legal Opinion

State v. Buie

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 5, 2011No. AC 31049PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LAVINE, J.

In this appeal, we must determine whether the apparent authority doctrine, 1 which is an exception to the warrant requirement, is constitutional under the constitution of Connecticut. We conclude that the apparent authority doctrine does not offend the right of Connecticut citizens to be free from unreasonable searches, a right guaranteed by article first, § 7. 2

The defendant, Robert S. Buie, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered following a jury trial, of two counts of aiding and abetting aggravated sexual assault in the first degree in violation of General…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  5. Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. CorreaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  2. State v. BuieSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  3. State v. BuieSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014
  4. State v. CorreaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  5. State v. OrlandoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API