Legal Opinion

Suthers v. Amgen Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 19, 2006No. 05 Civ. 4158(PKC)PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CASTEL, District Judge.

Plaintiffs have brought suit against Am-gen Inc. (“Amgen”), a pharmaceutical company owning the rights to an experimental treatment for Parkinson’s disease. The plaintiffs, Robert Suthers and Niwana Martin, participated in a clinical trial of the treatment conducted by a board certified neurologist who is on the faculty of the New York University School of Medicine (“NYUSOM”). Plaintiffs consider the treatment to be beneficial to them. Am-gen elected to terminate the clinical trial and, in their complaint, plaintiffs seek a permanent injunction…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Goshen v. Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Town of Castle Rock v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Pension Committee of the University of Montreal Pension Plan v. Banc of America Securities, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  2. Petedge, Inc. v. GargDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  3. Tufamerica, Inc. v. DiamondDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  4. King County v. IKB Deutsche Industriebank AGDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  5. Ray Legal Consulting Group v. DijosephDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API