Legal Opinion

Lucky Seven Rodeo Corp. v. Clark

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided June 9, 1988No. 880079-CAPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BILLINGS, Judge:

Appellant Lucky Seven Rodeo Corporation (“Lucky”) appeals from a summary judgment which terminated Lucky’s easement in property owned by respondent Pat Clark. Lucky contends that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment, arguing that the court misconstrued the unambiguous order establishing the easement or that the order granting the easement was ambiguous, and, thus, summary judgment was inappropriate. We reverse and remand.

In March of 1981, Lucky filed suit against Pat Clark to quiet title to a parcel of land, hereinafter referred to as the reservoir and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Atlas Corp. v. Clovis National BankUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Faulkner v. FarnsworthUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Wilburn v. Interstate ElectricCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  4. Holbrook Company v. AdamsUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Amjacs Interwest, Inc. v. Design AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Amica Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchettlerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  2. Washington National Insurance Co. v. Sherwood AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  3. Parents Against Drunk Drivers v. Graystone Pines Homeowners' Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  4. G.G.A., Inc. v. LeventisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  5. Idrive Logistics LLC v. Integracore LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API