Legal Opinion

Cotten v. Willingham

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 1, 1921No. 1822PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Potter County Court; R. C. Johnson, Judge. Suit by T. W. Cotten and others against G. W, Willingham. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

HALLÍ, J.

This suit was instituted in the county court by T. W. Cotten, R. A. Brock, and H. R. Kidd, real estate brokers, against appellee, to recover $600, alleged to be due them for commissions in procuring purchasers for certain real estate owned by appellee. They sue first upon a listing contract, and they plead in the alternative their right to recover upon quantum meruit. The appellee answered, admitting that he was the owner of the property mentioned in the petition and thát he listed the same with the plaintiffs for sale. He especially alleged in substance as follows:(1) That when he…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Boswell v. PannellTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Florida Athletic Club v. Hope Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1898
  3. Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Dodson v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  5. Jackson v. Home Nat. Bank of BairdCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. FordWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Peters v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  3. Joseph v. BostickTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  4. Caneer v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  5. Fry v. DoyleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API