Legal Opinion

Harp v. Patapsco Guano Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 23, 1896PublishedCited by 18 opinions

•Certiorari. Before Judge Fish. Macon superior court. May term, 1896.

1Opinion of the Court

Bumpkin, Justice.

An execution in favor of the Patapsco Guano Co. against Gouch, founded on a judgment rendered February 9, 1895, was, on October 15 of that year, levied upon a mule, which was claimed by JIarp. The issue thus made was tried in a .justice’s court before a jury, who found the property subject. The claimant thereupon took the case by certiorari to the superior court, alleging that the verdict was contrary to law and to evidence. The certiorari was overruled, and he excepted. From the evidence as set forth in the magistrate’s answer, it appears that Gouch bought the mule from Harp…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Merchants & Mechanics Bank v. Cottrell & SonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  2. Wiggins v. TumlinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  3. Derrick v. PierceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hill v. Ludden & Bates Southern Music HouseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Evans Motors of Georgia Inc. v. HearnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  3. Southern Pine Co. of Georgia v. Savannah Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1905
  4. Penland v. CatheySupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  5. Rowe v. SpencerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API