Legal Opinion
Hurst v. Miske
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided July 29, 1986PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Peter Tom, J.
This is a holdover proceeding brought by a prime tenant against the subtenant alleging that the subtenancy has been terminated.
In May 1980, petitioner, a rent-controlled tenant, placed an ad in a newspaper to sublet her apartment. Respondent responded and, thereafter, subleased petitioner’s apartment for a period of four months commencing on June 1, 1980. The *363sublease agreement was extended by petitioner, orally, for one year and in the fall of 1981, petitioner again extended the sublease but did not mention the period of the extension.
In or about October 1983…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sullivan v. Brevard AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Avon Furniture Leasing, Inc. v. PopolizioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Continental Towers Ltd. Partnership v. FreumanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1985
- Hutchins v. Conciliation & Appeals BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- BLF Realty Holding Corp. v. KasherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- 270 Riverside Drive, Inc. v. BraunAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2004
- Diamond v. MenascheCivil Court of the City of New York · 1988