Legal Opinion
270 Riverside Drive, Inc. v. Braun
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided June 9, 2004PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Order dated November 21, 2002 affirmed, with $10 costs.
Appeal from order dated June 28, 2002 dismissed, without costs, as academic.
Landlord sought possession of the subject four-bedroom rent-controlled apartment on the ground that the tenant engaged in profiteering by collecting rent from two roommates in the aggregate sum of $1,270, in excess of the legal regulated rent of $1,192. On the undisputed record evidence, including tenant’s previous deposition supplied by landlord, Civil Court correctly decided that a cause of action for eviction could not be proven. As landlord…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Pajak v. PajakNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Sullivan v. Brevard AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- BLF Realty Holding Corp. v. KasherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Continental Towers Ltd. Partnership v. FreumanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1985
- 520 East 81st Street Associates v. Roughton-HesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by6 opinions
- Roxborough Apartments Corp. v. BeckerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2006
- First Hudson Capital, LLC v. SeabornAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- D&R Realty Corp. v. BlakelyCivil Court of the City of New York · 2005
- Giachino Enterprises L.P. v. InokuchiCivil Court of the City of New York · 2005
- Ishida v. MarkowiczAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.