Legal Opinion
Rockefeller v. Bingaman
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 17, 2007No. 06-2332PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
MICHAEL W. McCONNELL, Circuit Judge.
In the pro se complaint that he filed in the district court, Tod N. Rockefeller asserted claims against two members of the United States Congress acting in their official capacities, the United States House of Representatives, and the United States Senate, alleging that he “has suffered injury from Defendants due to their enactment of laws which have deprived him of his civil *854and Constitutional rights.” R., Doc. 1 at 2. Mr. Rockefeller further alleged that: (1) “Defendants were served with a ‘Demand for the Introduction of a Bill…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Committee on Ways & Means of the U.S. House of RepresentativesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Gant v. United States Bankruptcy Court Western District of MichiganDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2025
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Adam B. SchiffDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Leopold v. PittmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Murphy v. LambornDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.