Legal Opinion

Leopold v. Pittman

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 20, 2022No. Civil Action No. 2021-0465Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JASON LEOPOLD, et al. Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 21-cv-00465 (BAH) v. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell J. THOMAS MANGER, Chief, U.S. Capitol Police, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs Jason Leopold and his employer Buzzfeed News assert that the common-law right to public access and certain statutory duties of disclosure require defendants, the Chief of the United States Capitol Police (“USCP”) and the Inspector General of the Capitol Police, both in their official capacities, to disclose certain requested documents relating…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API