Legal Opinion

Steinhoff v. Bullock

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1921No. Docket No. 57PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Genesee; Black (Edward D.), J. Assumpsit in justice’s court by James H. Steinhoff against George Bullock for installments due on a land contract. Defendant pleaded the general issue with notice of set-off. There was judgment of no cause for action, and defendant appealed to the circuit court. Judgment for defendant on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Plaintiff in justice’s court sued defendant to recover installments due upon a land contract. Defendant pleaded the general issue with notice of set-off, a claimed amount due defendant from plaintiff as his share of the profit arising from the sale of certain land. From a judgment of no cause of action, defendant appealed. In the circuit court plaintiff abandoned his claim and declaration and the claim made by the defendant’s plea became, counsel consenting, the issue for trial.

Plaintiff was a dealer in real estate. Defendant was a grocer, principally, and. somewhat inclined to dealing in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Carr v. LeavittMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Raub v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Morrison v. MeisterMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Tuttle v. BristolMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Brittson v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Davis v. HillmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API