Legal Opinion

Engage Learning, Inc. v. Salazar

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided October 5, 2011No. 2011-1007PublishedCited by 126 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge.

Engage Learning, Inc. (“Engage”) appeals from a decision of the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals (“the Board”) dismissing its appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Board held that it did not have jurisdiction under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 (“CDA”), 41 U.S.C. § 601 et seq., because Engage failed to establish that it had a contract with the government for the unpaid services. En gage Learning, Inc. v. Dep’t of the Interior, CBCA 1165, 2010 WL 2484235 (June 15, 2010) {“Board Op. ”). Because we conclude that the Board erred in dismissing the appeal…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by126 opinions

  1. Banks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  2. Columbus Regional Hospital v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
  3. Wamai v. Republic of SudanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  4. Canpro Investments, Ltd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  5. Huntington Promotional & Supply, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API