Legal Opinion

Alliance Steel, Inc. v. Piland

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 19, 2006No. 94,245PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pierron, J.:

Appellant, Alliance Steel, Inc., (Alliance) appeals the district court’s granting of appellees’ motion to dismiss this mechanic’s hen foreclosure action. The court applied Kansas’ closed-door statute, K.S.A. 17-7307(a), and held that a foreign corporation that conducts business in Kansas without authority and has failed to comply with the registration statutes may not maintain an action in Kansas. Appellant contends it is not barred by K.S.A. 17-7307(a) from bringing an action in Kansas courts because its activities are limited to interstate commerce and it is not subject to the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. International Textbook Co. v. PiggSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Buck Stove & Range Co. v. VickersSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Unified School District No. 233 v. Kansas Ass'n of American EducatorsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  4. Halley v. BarnabeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  5. Knight v. Neodesha Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alliance Steel, Inc. v. PilandCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
  2. Alliance Steel, Inc. v. PilandCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API