Buck Stove & Range Co. v. Vickers
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. The facts, which involve the application of § 1011, Rev. Stat., to writs of error to state courts and also the constitutionality of a statute of Kansas affecting the right of corporations of other States to do business in Kansas, are stated in the opinion. There is no misjoinder of plaintiffs in error.
Read the full summary
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. The facts, which involve the application of § 1011, Rev. Stat., to writs of error to state courts and also the constitutionality of a statute of Kansas affecting the right of corporations of other States to do business in Kansas, are stated in the opinion. There is no misjoinder of plaintiffs in error. Kansas City v. King, 65 Kansas, 65. Plaintiffs in error having been , engaged exclusively in interstate commerce, the application of the corporation laws of Kansas to them is repugnant to the interstate com-' merce clause of the Constitution of…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Van Devanter
By suits begun in the District Court of /Morris County,' Kansas, and consolidated for purposes of trial and judgment, seven judgment creditors of one Vickers sought to set aside, as fraudulent, a conveyance by himt and to subject the land included therein to the satisfaction of their several judgments. The plaintiffs were corporations organized under the laws of States' other than Kansas, and four of them were doing a purely interstate business in that State, but without complying with its laws presently to be mentioned. The defendants set up this non-compliance by an answer in the nature of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- International Textbook Co. v. PiggSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Crutcher v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Cooper Manufacturing Co. v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Hecht v. MalleySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Coastal Steel Corp. v. Tilghman Wheelabrator Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.