Legal Opinion
Mo-Kan Iron Workers Pension Fund v. Challenger Fence Co.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided March 17, 2006No. 03-0267-CV-W-JTMPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION
MAUGHMER, United States Magistrate Judge.
On March 26, 2003, plaintiffs Mo-Kan Iron Workers Pension Fund, Mo-Kan Iron Workers Welfare Fund and Mo-Kan Workers Apprenticeship, Training and Education Fund 1 (collectively referred to as the “Mo-Kan Funds”) filed the present action against defendant Challenger Fence Co. Inc. (“Challenger Fence”). In this action, the Mo-Kan Funds seek collection of allegedly delinquent contributions totaling $894,000.00 from Challenger Fence to employee benefit plans pursuant to the Employee Retirement, Income and Security Act of 1974, 29…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Local Union No. 103, International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Southwest Administrators, Inc. v. Rozay's Transfer, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Rosen v. Biscayne Yacht & Country Club, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Winthrop Resources Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation v. Eaton Hydraulics, Inc., Formerly Known as Vickers, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Carpenters Fringe Benefit Funds of Illinois v. McKenzie EngineeringCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- AMERICAN CLEANERS AND LAUN. v. Textile ProcessorsDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2007