Legal Opinion
Gerety Estate
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 13, 1944No. Appeal, 132PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Curiam,
A petition for reargument has been presented. An order was made following the argument sustaining the appeal and remitting the record without prejudice. *
The case arose under the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act of June 18, 1923, P. L. 840, as amended by the Act of April 25,1935, P. L. 72, and supplemented by the Act of May 22, 1935, P. L. 228, 12 PS, section 831, et seq, as amended by the Act of May 26,1943, P. L. 645.
The sole question is one of establishing the identity of the executrix and residuary legatee named in the will. Appellee, Margaret McCarty, claims that she is the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kariher's Petition (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Taylor v. Haverford TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Capital Bank and Trust Company's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Erie City v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Oberts v. BlickensSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
3Cited by20 opinions
- Gardner v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Johnson EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Philadelphia Manufacturers Mutual Fire Insurance v. RoseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- American Casualty Co. v. KLIGERMANSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Keefer EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.