Beverly v. Davis
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the superior court for Okanogan county, C. H. Neal, Esq., judge pro tempore, entered March 81, 1913, in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for reformation.
1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.
The purpose of this action is to have a transaction, evidenced by a deed and option, declared a mortgage. The court found that the instruments were intended as a mortgage, directed the defendants, by an interlocutory order, to state the amount of the indebtedness within thirty days, and in case of failure to do so, left them to seek their remedy in an independent action to foreclose the mortgage. The defendants filed a statement of the amount advanced to the plaintiffs within the time fixed, and the court thereafter, upon notice to the plaintiffs, determined the amount due. Whereupon a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Johnson v. National Bank of CommerceWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Dane v. DanielWashington Supreme Court · 1900
- Plummer v. IlseWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Hoover v. BouffleurWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Boyer v. PaineWashington Supreme Court · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Stadium Apartments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Clinton v. Utah Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1925
- Carlson v. DruseWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Pittwood v. Spokane Savings & Loan SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- Bavelis v. Doukas (In re Bavelis)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.