Legal Opinion
Rock Wool Insulating Company v. Huston
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided November 16, 1959No. 18505PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mir. Justice Doyle.
Plaintiff in error was the defendant in the trial court. An action was there instituted by Huston, defendant in error here, on a promissory note executed February 9, 1951, in the amount of $6,000.00 plus interest at the rate of 5% per annum, together with attorney’s fees in the amount of 15%. The case was tried to the court and judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff. Defendant now seeks review and reversal by writ of error.
One A. E. Reilly was at the time of the execution of the note in suit President and General Manager of the defendant corporation.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jones v. First National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
- Rittmaster v. BrisbaneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
- Florence Oil & Refining Co. v. Hiawatha Gas, Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1913
- Montrose Land & Investment Co. v. Greeley National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
- Sanford Cattle Co. v. WilliamsColorado Court of Appeals · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. v. AndrewsColorado Court of Appeals · 1987
- Southern Colorado Orthopaedic Clinic Sports Medicine & Arthritis Surgeons, P.C. v. WeinsteinColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- Gulick v. A. Robert Strawn & Associates, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1970
- In Re Custody of ThomasColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
- Waterman v. SullivanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.