Legal Opinion

Koonce v. City of Mesquite

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 16, 1964No. 13Published

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

The Appellant has filed his Motion for Rehearing, complaining of our holding that he had not shown diligence in obtaining a Statement of Facts and that the failure to obtain a Statement of Facts must be assigned as error and presented by a Bill of Exception. After careful consideration of Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing, we remain convinced of the correctness of our previous holding. As additional authority on the point that the failure to obtain a Statement of Facts must be presented by a Bill of Exception and assigned as error, we cite the case of Comer v. Farrell,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rankin v. Nash-Texas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Federal Underwriters Exchange v. HustedCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Comer v. FarrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Ludtke v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Meacham v. LylesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API