Legal Opinion

Comer v. Farrell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 7, 1931No. 11029PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLooney, J.

On October 3, 1931, we overruled appellants’ motion to reverse and remand, based upon the ground that, without their fault, they had been deprived of a full and complete statement of all the facts proven on the trial below. The question was presented by motion simply, supported alone by affidavits, as no bill of exception was reserved to the action of the court approving the incomplete statement, nor did they assign error thereon. In overruling the motion to reverse and remand "on the ground presented, we followed the well-established rule that, to entitle a litigant to a reversal, under the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. Rankin v. Nash-Texas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. Koonce v. City of MesquiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  4. Koonce v. City of MesquiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  5. Logan v. SandelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API