State v. Thompson
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
"VVTH. “Dub” Arnold, Chief Justice.
The State has W. brought this appeal to determine whether it is precluded by collateral estoppel from charging a defendant with “knowingly” committing an offense when the defendant has already been convicted of “negligently” committing a separate offense involving different elements but arising out of the same actions. We hold that the collateral estoppel effect attributed to the Double Jeopardy Clause does not preclude a defendant from being charged with a subsequent offense arising out of the same actions when the elements of the offenses are different. As…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Conley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
- State v. NicholsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- State v. DawsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Carwell Elevator Co., Inc. v. LeathersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- State v. PittmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.