State v. Pittman
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Donald L. Corbin, Justice.
The State of Arkansas brings this interlocutory appeal from the order of the Desha County Circuit Court granting Appellee Robert Pittman Jr.’s motion to suppress a custodial statement. The trial court suppressed the statement because it concluded that the officer had continued the interrogation environment after Appellee had invoked his rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), and that the officer knew or should have known that his actions would have likely caused Appellee to incriminate himself. The State contends that the trial court’s ruling is based…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. BarrettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- State v. NicholsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- State v. WilmothSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- State v. BoyetteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.