Legal Opinion

Thompson, Et Vir v. Harris

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 24, 1941PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChapman, J.

The sole question presented by this appeal for a decision here is the sufficiency of the evidence to show a common law marriage between Rose B. Adams and the deceased, Fred W. Adams. The chancellor below was of the view, and so decreed, that the testimony clearly established a common law marriage between the parties.

Common law marriages are recognized and sustained by the laws of Florida. See Mendel v. Mendel, 147 Fla. 167, 1 So. (2nd) 571; Orr v. State, 129 Fla. 398, 176 So. 510; Garcia v. Exchange Nat. Bank, 123 Fla. 726, 167 So. 518; Catlett v. Chestnut, 107 Fla. 498, 146 So. 241, 91…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Catlett v. Chestnut, as Exr.Supreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. Leblanc v. YawnSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  3. Marsicano v. MarsicanoSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  4. Warren v. WarrenSupreme Court of Florida · 1913
  5. Chaves v. ChavesSupreme Court of Florida · 1920

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chivers v. Couch Motor Lines, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Fincher v. FincherSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  3. Thompson v. HarrisSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
  4. Fidanque v. FidanqueNew York Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Fidanque v. FidanqueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API