Legal Opinion
Thompson v. Harris
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided May 1, 1942PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHAPMAN, J.:
This case is before the Court on petition for an interlocutory writ of certiorari. It comes here for the second time. For the first appearance see Thompson v. Harris, 148 Fla. 328, 4 So. (2nd) 385. On the going down of the mandate, the chancellor below on December 12, 1941, entered an order substituting Attorney Nelson Sherrod in the place of Hon. Edward W. Harris, because of conflicting interests between the latter as representative of the Fred W. Adams Estate and the claims of Rose B. Adams.
On December 29, 1941, the solicitor for Rose B. Adams, filed with the clerk of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Norris Et Ux. v. EikenberrySupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Guggenheimer & Co. v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
- Crosby v. BurlesonSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
- Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
- Pournelle v. BaxterSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Estate of Monks v. Florida National BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
- Blanton v. State Ex Rel. McManusSupreme Court of Florida · 1947