Legal Opinion

People v. Andujas

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 18, 1992PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Hancock, Jr., J.

When a defendant charged with selling drugs to an undercover officer has purchased a portion of the drugs for his own use and the balance as agent for the officer, he may — notwithstanding his personal interest in a portion of the drugs as a purchaser — nevertheless be entitled to an agency defense as to the balance. Here, according to defendant’s testimony, one of *115the drug sales for which he was convicted was a purchase for himself and for the undercover officer as an agent. The primary question presented in his appeal concerns the court’s instruction to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. Lam Lek ChongNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. People v. ArgibayNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. People v. RocheNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. People v. KitchingNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. People v. BranchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. People v. HerringNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. People v. KnightNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. People v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. People v. DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. The People v.Christopher E. WalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 2015

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API