People v. Andujas
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Hancock, Jr., J.
When a defendant charged with selling drugs to an undercover officer has purchased a portion of the drugs for his own use and the balance as agent for the officer, he may — notwithstanding his personal interest in a portion of the drugs as a purchaser — nevertheless be entitled to an agency defense as to the balance. Here, according to defendant’s testimony, one of *115the drug sales for which he was convicted was a purchase for himself and for the undercover officer as an agent. The primary question presented in his appeal concerns the court’s instruction to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. Lam Lek ChongNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. ArgibayNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. RocheNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. KitchingNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. BranchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- People v. HerringNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. KnightNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- The People v.Christopher E. WalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.