Casillas v. S.W.I.G.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Judge.
Plaintiff suffered a compensable injury and is being paid compensation benefits. His suit made two claims: (1) that our compensation statute violated due process to the extent the disability benefits were inadequate in amount; and (2) that he was entitled to a ten percent increase in disability benefits under our safety device statute, § 52-1-10, N.M.S.A. 1978. The trial court ruled against each claim; plaintiff appeals. Due Process — Amount of Disability Benefits
Plaintiff recognizes that he comes within § 52-1-9, N.M.S.A. 1978, which provides that his right to compensation…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Lincoln Federal Labor Union v. Northwestern Iron & Metal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Howell Ex Rel. Howell v. BurkNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Valdez v. Cillessen & Son, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
- Garcia v. Village of TijerasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
- Alber Ex Rel. Alber v. NolleNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
- Candelaria v. General Electric Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
- Garrison Ex Rel. Estate of Garrison v. Safeway StoresNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.