Legal Opinion

Brown v. Musser-Sauntry Land, Logging & Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 1, 1908No. Nos. 15,566—(46)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action in the district court for Washington county to recover $2,000 damages for personal injuries. The case was tried before Stolberg, J., and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for the sum demanded. From an order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.

The plaintiff, on February 21, 1902, was in the employ of the defendant as a landing man at its camp in the woods, and while engaged as such employee in unloading logs he was thrown down and seriously injured by a log falling upon him. He brought this action to recover damages for such injury, on the ground that it was caused by the negligence of the defendant. He had a verdict for $2,000, and the defendant appealed from an order denying its motion for judgment or a new trial.

The logs, which were cut in the woods and hauled to the landing, were from twelve to eighteen feet long and from six…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Greene v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  2. Anderson v. FieldingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  3. Rothenberger v. Northwestern Consolidated Milling Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  4. Antletz v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  5. Schlitz v. Pabst Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Geis v. HodgmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  2. Liptak v. KarsnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  3. Fischer v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  4. Harris v. BottomSupreme Court of Vermont · 1910
  5. Vance v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API