Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Benson v. Stanley

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 10, 1933No. 29,119PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIBELL, Justice.

The defendant Matthew Keeley appeals from an order of the district court of Waseca county made March 14, 1932, denying his motion that the state include 40 acres, owned by him, in a pending condemnation proceeding for the acquisition of a right of way for a portion of trunk highway No. 7 in Waseca county, to the end that damages therefor be assessed. Upon the hearing an order dated January 5,1932, was made requiring the inclusion of the 40. After-wards the court of its own motion, by an order dated March 14, 1932, the one now on appeal, vacated the order of January 5, 1932,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Utick v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  2. State ex rel. Smith v. Van ReedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. State ex rel. Hilton v. VollSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  4. Burns v. EsslingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  5. State Ex Rel. Benson v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Spanel v. Mounds View School District No. 621Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  2. Burnquist v. CookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  3. State, by Peterson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  4. State Ex Rel. Peterson v. BentleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  5. Regan v. BabcockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API