Roberson v. Carolina Taxi Service, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.
Appellants challenge the correctness of the result below chiefly on the ground that the plaintiff’s evidence conclusively showed such contributory negligence on his part that their motion for judgment of nonsuit should have been allowed. They urge that by reason of the fact that plaintiff voluntarily took a position of danger on the running board of a moving automobile he was, as a matter of law, barred of recovery for„an injury to which, it is contended, his own negligence thus proximately contributed.
This presents the question whether the mere fact that the plaintiff was standing on the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Graham v. . CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Newell v. . DarnellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Baur v. CalicCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
- Anderson v. Detroit Motorbus Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Holderfield v. Rummage Bros. Trucking Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Spivey v. NewmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Boone v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Whitley v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.