Smith v. Foster
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Tama District Court. — Hon. J. M. Parker, Judge. Action in equity to enjoin the maintenance of a liq-our nuisance. There was a decree for the plaintiff from which both parties appeal. As the defendants’ appeal was first perfected, the defendants will be designated as appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtMcClain, C. J.
The defendant, Foster, is a druggist having a permit for the sale of intoxicating liquors at the town of Gladbrook. The defendant, Eehder, is the owner of the building in which Foster conducts his drug store. No complaint of the violation of the intoxicating liquor law is made against Foster save that prior to the institution of this action, in May, 1910, he had in seven instances sold intoxicating liquors on requests which were irregular and insufficient because not in compliance with the specific requirements of chapter 139 of the acts of the 33d General Assembly, amendatory of Code,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- Barber v. BrennanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Lewis v. BrennanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Offil v. Westbrook & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- State v. SwallumSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Seeburger v. PickettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- State Ex Rel. Seeburger v. JamesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- State Ex Rel. Seeburger v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- State Ex Rel. Seeburger v. DeeneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- State ex rel. Rippey v. GruenerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923