Legal Opinion

State v. Swallum

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 12, 1900PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Hardm District Gourt. — Hon. S. M. Weaver, Judge. The defendant was tried on an indictment for nuisance, in the sale of intoxicating liquors. He was convicted, and. appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwin, J.

1 The instructions of the court submitted to the jury the question of whether the defendant sold intoxicating liquor upon a physician’s prescription, without taking a written request therefor. The only evidence before the court, touching that question, was that of a witness who testified “that he bought prescriptions for others, but did not know how they read, or whether they called for intoxicating liquors or not.” There was, no evidence that the prescriptions sold by defendant to this witness contained intoxicating liquors. The instruction complained of submitted to the jury a material…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Field v. SchricherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
  2. White v. SpanglerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  3. State v. ArcherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  4. Negley v. CowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Barber v. BrennanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  2. Long v. JoderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. Rizer v. TapperSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  4. Smith v. FosterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  5. Stromert v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API