Legal Opinion

Mansour v. Abrams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1988PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously modified on the law, and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Defendants appeal from an order denying without prejudice their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint pending compliance with a discovery order to which they had stipulated. We previously reinstated five causes of action which had been dismissed for failure to state a cause of action (Mansour v Abrams, 120 AD2d 933). We now hold that summary judgment should have been granted on the eighth cause of action dismissing it with respect to defendant Goldstock…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Murtha v. Yonkers Child Care Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Kartiganer Associates, P. C. v. Town of New WindsorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mahoney v. Temporary Commission of InvestigationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Heffernan v. Colonie Country Club, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Hurwitch v. KercullAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Mansour v. AbramsNew York Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Ramsey v. H.M.S. Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API