Legal Opinion

Pine Building Co. v. Grossman

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided January 24, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The complainant is engaged in building homes for the owners of real estate and financing the construction thereof. It entered into a contract with the defendant, under the terms of which the latter was to secure contracts for such work and was to receive one-quarter of the profits upon all such contracts so obtained by him and stand one-quarter of the losses, if any, that should grow out of such contracts. There was provision for periodical accounting and some other details, of no moment for present purposes.

Subsequent misunderstandings and disputes led to a termination of the contract by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Inhabitants of Township v. WattersNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1901
  2. Braddock v. HinchmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
  3. Seymour v. Long Dock Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1869
  4. Crane v. ElySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1883

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Burdick v. GrimshawNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  2. Township of Ewing v. TrentonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945
  3. Maihack v. MehlNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
  4. Savage v. DowrieNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API