Legal Opinion

Seymour v. Long Dock Co.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 15, 1869PublishedCited by 4 opinions

This cause was argued before the Hon. Thomas P. Carpenter, one of the masters of the court, sitting for the Chancellor, on bill, answer, replication, and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

The Master.

The Long Dock Company is a company incorporated by act ■ of February 26th, 1856, (Pamph. Laws, p. 67,) for the purpose of constructing a tunnel through Bergen hill, and ,certain accessories, intended for-the use of the New York and Erie Eailroad Company. The Long Dock Company-made a contract, dated May '28t-h, 1856, with one James H. Mallery, for the excavation of this, tunnel. The contract is set out in full in the complainant’s bill. Mallery *403had performed but a small part of the work undertaken when he abandoned it, in October, 1857.

John P. Cumming, February 14tli, 1859, entered…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Seth v. CramerCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1825
  2. Grandin v. Le Roy & SmythNew York Court of Chancery · 1831

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Burdick v. GrimshawNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  2. Maihack v. MehlNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
  3. Pine Building Co. v. GrossmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
  4. Slavin v. St. Stephens Roman, C., ChurchNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API