Legal Opinion

State v. Wessels

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 31, 1988No. C5-88-609PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

A. PAUL LOMMEN, Judge.

The state appeals a pretrial order for in camera questioning of a government informant. We affirm.

FACTS

On December 8,1987, the St. Paul police obtained a warrant to search respondent Jerome Wessels, his car, and his home for stolen property and controlled substances. The warrant was issued on the basis of information reported by an informant. The informant gave the police some methamphetamine (“krank”) allegedly purchased at Wessels’ home, and stated that he/she had personal knowledge that Wessels had sold “krank” in exchange for specific stolen property, which…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. State v. Joon Kyu KimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. State v. WileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  4. State v. FlorineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. State v. LuciowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. SolheimCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  2. State v. KeetonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API