Legal Opinion

Blacklock v. Small

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 23, 1888No. 148PublishedCited by 42 opinions

APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT .OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. This was a bill in equity, filed on the 8th of October, 1879, in the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of South Carolina,, -.jy Emma Jane Blacklock and Mary Black-lock, citizens of Georgia, against Jacob Small, a citizen of South Carolina, Alexander Bobertson, a citizen of North Carolina, and Helen Bobertson Blacklock, a citizen of. South Carolina.

Read the full summary

APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT .OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. This was a bill in equity, filed on the 8th of October, 1879, in the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of South Carolina,, -.jy Emma Jane Blacklock and Mary Black-lock, citizens of Georgia, against Jacob Small, a citizen of South Carolina, Alexander Bobertson, a citizen of North Carolina, and Helen Bobertson Blacklock, a citizen of. South Carolina. The substance of the allegations of the bill was that, on the 20th. of March, 1860, John F. Blacklock, the father of the plaintiffs, owning a…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blatchford

It appears by the proofs in the record that John F. Black-lock, the assignor of the bond, was, at the time of the assignment, a citizen of South Carolina, and continued to be such until this suit was commenced, and' that the defendant Small was, when this suit was commenced, a citizen of South Carolina. Under these circumstances, the provision of the 1st section of the act of Congress of March 3, 1875, c. 137, (18 Stat. 470,) applies to this case. That provision is as follows : “Nor shall any Circuit or District Court have cognizance of any suit founded on contract in favor of an assignee,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Ayres v. WiswallSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. IdeSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Bushnell v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  5. Central R. Co. of NJ v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. WillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Morris v. GilmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Metcalf v. WatertownSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Wagner Electric Manufacturing Co. v. LyndonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API