Legal Opinion
Crockett & Myers, Ltd. v. Napier, Fitzgerald & Kirby, LLP
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 21, 2009No. 07-16191, 07-16534PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
D.W. NELSON, Senior Circuit Judge:
Napier, Fitzgerald & Kirby, LLP and Brian Fitzgerald (collectively “Fitzgerald”) appeal the district court’s dismissal of their Second Amended Counterclaim (“SAC”). They also appeal the district court’s award of quantum meruit compensation subsequent to a bench trial. Crockett & Myers, Ltd. and J.R. Crockett, Jr. (“Crockett”) cross-appeal the district court’s denial of its posttrial motion for attorneys’ fees. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we (1) affirm the dismissal of Fitzgerald’s SAC; (2) affirm the denial of Crockett’s motion for…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Evel Knievel Krystal Knievel v. Espn, a Subsidiary of Walt Disney, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.California Supreme Court · 1990
- Beattie v. ThomasNevada Supreme Court · 1983
- Mro Communications, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Company, Now At&t Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Champion Produce, Inc. v. Ruby Robinson Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. KB HomeDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2010
- Bobadilla-German v. Bear Creek Orchards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Crockett & Myers, Ltd. v. Napier, Fitzgerald & Kirby, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Aaniyah Clay v. Trans Union LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2026
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.