Legal Opinion

Crockett & Myers, Ltd. v. Napier, Fitzgerald & Kirby, LLP

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 16, 2011No. 10-16040PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Brian Fitzgerald appeals for a second time the district court’s award to him of $33,333 in quantum meruit based on the unjust enrichment he conferred on Appellee Crockett & Myers, Ltd. (Crockett). In his first appeal, Fitzgerald argued to a previous panel of this court 1 that the district court’s quantum meruit award was erroneous because Fitzgerald referred a major client to Crockett but the award did not account for the value of that referral. The panel agreed and remanded with instructions that the district court recalculate Fitzgerald’s quantum meruit award to include the value of…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Hatahley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Chase Jarvis Chase Jarvis Inc., a Washington Corporation v. K2 Inc., a Delaware Corporation K-2 CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. Crockett & Myers, Ltd. v. Napier, Fitzgerald & Kirby, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Thompson v. HerrmannNevada Supreme Court · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jason Scott Collection, Inc. v. Trendily Furniture, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API