Legal Opinion

Blickenstaff v. Bankers Mortgage Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 10, 1972No. [No. 255, September Term, 1971.]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDigges, J.

The appellants here, Earl O. Blickenstaff and his wife, Mary, initiated this litigation against appellees, Bankers Mortgage Company, Atlas Subsidiaries of Delaware, Inc. and two trustees, A. J. Mascetta and Ralph O. Weed. They sought to set aside both a promissory note held by Atlas and a deed of trust on their home given as security for the note. Appellants also requested that Atlas be enjoined from foreclosing the deed of trust and required to return to them all money which they had previously paid.

This controversy germinated in the relatively serene confines of a beauty salon during March…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Financial Credit Corp. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  2. Bletzer v. CookseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
  3. Blum v. ApitzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  4. Cromwell v. Sharon Building & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McCullar v. UNIV. UNDERWRITERS LIFE INS.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  2. Duckworth v. BernsteinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  3. Bowers v. WebstaurantstoreDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API