United States v. Edward A. Thomas
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ALDISERT, Circuit Judge:
The issue in this case is whether Edward A. Thomas, a Montana hunting guide and outfitter, may be found guilty by jury of two counts of conspiracy to violate the Lacey Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 3371 et seq. The alleged object of the conspiracy was “to transport, receive and acquire elk in interstate commerce ... in violation of Montana state hunter’s law.” Although this court has previously established that a prosecution under the Act may not properly be had for the substantive acts of selling guiding services and hunting permits, United States v. Stenberg, 803 F.2d 422 (9th…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. FeolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States Department of Justice v. JulianSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Ramon MATTA-BALLESTEROS, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. James Franklin Ray, United States of America v. James Franklin RayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Ruben Taren-Palma, United States of America v. Ismael Calderon-PerezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- River City Markets, Inc. v. Fleming Foods West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Melville O'Neal AtkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.