United States v. Garcia-Ortiz
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
Following resentencing, defendant-appellant José A. Garcia-Ortiz challenges his conviction and sentence on one of three counts of conviction on the ground that the challenged conviction and sentence violate the Double Jeopardy Clause. He simulta neously challenges his sentence on another count as unreasonably high, castigating the district court for denying him a mitigating role adjustment. In a pro se supplementary brief, he augments this asseverational array by challenging both the legitimacy of his conviction and the sentencing court’s failure to reduce his sentence…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Rutledge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Pepper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. LeahyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Garcia-OrtizCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- United States v. ChiaradioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Zhen Zhou WuCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- United States v. SassoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.