Migura v. Dukes
Texas Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The sole issue in this case is whether a devisee under a will is an indispensable party in a suit to establish a lien against real property of the decedent’s estate. The court of appeals answered this question in the affirmative. 758 S.W.2d 831. Because the decision of the court of appeals conflicts with prior opinions of this court, a majority of the court, without hearing oral argument, reverses the judgment of the court of appeals and affirms the judgment of the trial court. Tex.R.App.P. 133.
In a prior case, Delphine Migura brought suit against E.J. Migura to establish the existence of a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Howard v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Bankers Home Building & Loan Ass'n v. WyattTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Day v. DayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Tucker v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
- Dukes v. MiguraCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Supak v. Zboril, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
- Harris County Flood Control District v. Glenbrook Patiohome Owners Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1996
- Carl Blankenship, Individually and as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Rosalind Blankenship v. Jackson Wightman, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
- Covenant Clearinghouse, LLC v. Christa J. Foster, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2022
- Larry Long and Woodbine Production Corporation v. Miken Oil, Inc. and Mike Tate, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.