United States v. Monte T. Dochterman
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Per curiam
Monte Dochterman pleaded guilty to one count of bank robbery and was given the maximum sentence of twenty years and committed for study pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4205(c) (1976). After completion of the study, the court reduced his sentence to eight years. On April 6, 1979, Dochterman filed a section 2255 motion alleging that his attorney and the prosecuting attorney coerced him into pleading guilty. 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1976). The court referred the case to a magistrate, who, after a hearing, recommended that the petition be denied. The district court, adopting the magistrate’s recommendation,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Daniel L. SHULL, Appellant, v. DAIN, KALMAN & QUAIL, INC., a Corporation, and Harry Ware, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Sam GoldmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- Constance Snodgrass, as Special Administratrix of the Estate of Michael P. Snodgrass, Deceased v. Wayne Lee NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- Automated Controls, Inc. v. Mic Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Lonnie Edward VogtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Carlos ValleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Sam Miller Bag Company v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Terry Plunk v. Ray HobbsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.