Legal Opinion

United States v. Monte T. Dochterman

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 1, 1980No. 80-1267PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Monte Dochterman pleaded guilty to one count of bank robbery and was given the maximum sentence of twenty years and committed for study pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4205(c) (1976). After completion of the study, the court reduced his sentence to eight years. On April 6, 1979, Dochterman filed a section 2255 motion alleging that his attorney and the prosecuting attorney coerced him into pleading guilty. 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1976). The court referred the case to a magistrate, who, after a hearing, recommended that the petition be denied. The district court, adopting the magistrate’s recommendation,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Daniel L. SHULL, Appellant, v. DAIN, KALMAN & QUAIL, INC., a Corporation, and Harry Ware, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  2. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Sam GoldmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  3. Constance Snodgrass, as Special Administratrix of the Estate of Michael P. Snodgrass, Deceased v. Wayne Lee NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  4. Automated Controls, Inc. v. Mic Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  2. United States v. Lonnie Edward VogtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Carlos ValleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  4. Sam Miller Bag Company v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  5. Terry Plunk v. Ray HobbsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API