Legal Opinion

Continental Insurance v. Hodges

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 5, 1976No. 75-340PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Conley Byrd, Justice.

The sole issue on this appeal by Continental Insurance Company is whether, under the terms of a liability insurance policy, it is obligated to defend appellees David A. Hodges and Kaneaster Hodges, Jr. in an action brought against them for allegedly casting surface water upon their neighbor’s property.

The policy provides:

“The company will pay on behalf of the insured all sums which the insured shall become legally obligated to pay as damages because of

A. bodily injury or

B. property damage

to which this insurance applies, caused by an occurrence, ...”

The word “occurrence”…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cross v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Ins. Co., LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
  2. City of Kimball v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Otterman v. Union Mutual Fire Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 1972
  4. Proctor Seed & Feed Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1973

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Essex Insurance v. HolderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  2. Silverball Amusement, Inc. v. Utah Home Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1994
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Geurin Contractors, Inc. v. Bituminous Casualty Corp.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
  5. Parker Law Firm v. The Travelers Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API