Legal Opinion
Essex Insurance v. Holder
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided March 6, 2008No. 07-803PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Tom Glaze, Justice.
We accepted certification of a single question of Arkansas law submitted by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas under Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 6-8, asking this court whether defective construction or workmanship is an “accident” and, therefore, an “occurrence” within the meaning of commercial general liability insurance policies.
Tom and Kara Baumgartner contracted with John Holder’s J&H Enterprises to build their new home; however, before construction of the home was completed, the Baumgartners filed suit against Holder in the Pulaski County…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kvaerner Metals Division of Kvaerner US, Inc. v. Commercial Union Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Monticello Insurance v. Wil-Freds Construction, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996
- Auto-Owners Insurance v. Home Pride Companies, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- Amerisure, Inc. v. Wurster Const. Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- ACUITY v. Burd & Smith Construction, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Motorists Mutual Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2010
- Pinnacle Group, Inc. v. Erie Insurance Property & Casualty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2013
- Ohio N. Univ. v. Charles Constr. Servs., Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- Black & Veatch Corporation v. Aspen InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Westfield Insurance v. Custom Agri Systems, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.