Legal Opinion

Moberly v. Watson

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 17, 1937PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action to set aside a deed to two parcels of land in Crawford County, aggregating 28.59 acres. The trial court found for defendants and plaintiffs appealed.

[1] It is suggested by defendants (respondents here) that the appeal should be dismissed because "the record is not properly abstracted" and because there was no "extension of time" for filing bill of exceptions. The point on the abstract is that the evidence is not properly set out. Appellants, in a way, state the effect of the evidence, instead of narrating in the first person. Such is not a satisfactory way to abstract the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. Ohio Millers Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  2. May v. GiblerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  3. Farmers' Bank v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  4. Oldham v. WrightSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  5. Peoples Bank Ex Rel. Moberly v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Powers v. ShoreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  2. Lowther v. HaysSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  3. Conrad v. Diehl.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  4. Talley v. BuchananSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  5. Bolten v. ColburnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API