Legal Opinion

Cross, Kieschnick & Co. v. Johnston

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided January 31, 1994No. 04-93-00332-CVPublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOPEZ, Justice.

The central issue raised by this appeal is whether the turnover statute can be used by a judgment creditor to cure a misnomer after a trial judgment has become final. We hold that this is an improper use of the turnover statute. We render as void the turnover order and its supplemental order.

FACTS

Leslie and Wanda Johnston (appellees) litigated their DTPA cause of action against Cross, Kieschnick & Company (Cross & Company) on their Second Amended Original Petition. The petition named the defendant as “Cross, Kieschnick & Company, Inc.” In its Third Amended Original Answer Cross…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Barr v. Resolution Trust Corp. Ex Rel. Sunbelt Federal SavingsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Beaumont Bank, N.A. v. BullerTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Litton Industrial Products, Inc. v. GammageTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Mower v. BoyerTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  5. D/FW Commercial Roofing Co., Inc. v. Mehra, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Maiz v. ViraniCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  2. Resolution Trust Corp. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  3. Stroop v. Northern County Mutual Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004
  4. Gerjets v. Davila, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
  5. Bolloré S.A. v. Import Warehouse, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API