Legal Opinion
Double H Plastics, Inc. v. Sonoco Products Company
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 23, 1984No. 83-1111PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SEITZ, Chief Judge:
Plaintiff Double H Plastics, Inc., appeals from a final order of the district court entering judgment in favor of the defendant Sonoco Products Company on the plaintiff’s claim under section 2(a) of the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 13(a) (1982). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
I
The plaintiff and defendant are competitors in the business of producing and selling business machine cores, small spools that carry the paper used in adding machines, cash registers, and other business machines. Slight differences in diameter distinguish the cores…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Federal Trade Commission v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- O. Hommel Company v. Ferro CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Double H Plastics, Inc. v. Sonoco Products Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
3Cited by11 opinions
- Weiss v. York HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Gulf Oil Corporation, in No. 89-2049 v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, in No. 89-2050 v. Gulf Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Weiss v. York HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Cemar, Inc. v. Nissan Motor Corp. in U.S.A.District Court, D. Delaware · 1988
- W.H. Brady Co. v. Lem Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.