Legal Opinion

Odom v. Linsey

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 22, 1978No. 77-571PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal, from a judgment adverse to contestants in a Will contest case, raises a single dispositive issue: Whether a general exception (objection) to a refused requested jury instruction sufficiently complied with ARCP 51 to invoke appellate review? In the narrow context here presented, we answer in the negative and affirm.

The charge in question reads as follows:

"If the jury believe from the evidence that the instrument offered for probate as the will of Emma Lee Odom is the result or product of undue influence exercised by Lamon E. Linsey, Edna Lee Linsey, Lamon Tyler Linsey or any other…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pruitt v. PruittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  2. Hosey v. Seibels Bruce Group, S.C. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  3. Gardner v. DorseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  4. Feazell v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  5. Dees v. GilleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Grayco Resources, Inc. v. PooleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Gray v. Mobile Greyhound Park, Ltd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  3. Zills v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  4. Record Data Intern., Inc. v. NicholsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  5. City of Birmingham v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API