Legal Opinion

Ammann v. Daniel Oil Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 20, 1949No. 9792PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHER, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an order overruling the three separate pleas of privilege of the defendants Jack Ammann, I. A. McNab and S. H. Fagadau, defendants Jack Am-mann and I. A. McNab claiming the right to be sued in Bexar County, Texas, and S. H. Fagadau advising the court in his plea of privilege that it was satisfactory to him that the case be removed either to Bexar County, Texas, or to the county of his residence,-being Wichita County, Texas.

The plaintiff, Daniel Oil Company, filed three controverting pleas, one addressed to each of the pleas of privilege of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ball v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1929
  2. McKinney v. MoonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  3. Bethlehem Supply Corp. v. Wotola Royalty Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  4. O'Brien v. Greene Production Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Calhoun v. PadgettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  2. Johnston v. BrachtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  3. Hollis v. BooneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  4. Martin v. McKenzieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  5. Burke v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API