Legal Opinion

Ball v. Davis

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1929No. 5152PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Cureton

This suit was brought by T. M. Davis against G. M. Ball, to recover wages for labor performed by himself and by a co-worker by the name of Morgan, whose claim he held by assignment, and to foreclose a mechanic’s or laborer’s lien asserted to secure each of the claims on an oil well drilling machine, rig, etc., on the well drilled by them with the machine, together with about 3000 feet of casing, some of which was in the well, and also on the oil and gas leases on which the well was located. The trial court awarded judgment to Davis for $1664.18 with a foreclosure of the liens as prayed for.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cox v. RobisonTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Strang v. PrayTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Farmers' & Mechanics' National Bank v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Moore v. Carey Bros. Oil Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  5. Moore v. Carey Bros. Oil Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Noble Exploration, Inc. v. Nixon Drilling Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Hawn Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Huddleston v. NislarCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. McConnell v. FrostCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Oil Field Salvage Co. v. SimonTexas Supreme Court · 1943

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API